Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Thesis Chunk #4


Hello folks,

Here is another draft.  Some of the stuff might be recognizable.  I just added to it.  As always your comments are both welcomed and appreciated.






Craig Knight
April 23, 2012



Bob Kane Meets Bruce Wayne:  The Genesis of the Caped Crusader
            Although there have been many incarnations of the Batman character, they all spring from what I view as his five essential character traits.  Anyone who is introduced to the comic would be unable to get far without seeing that these 5 components are both vital and appealing when defining him as a superhero.  The appeal of these traits is that they could all be described as human, which is a direct contrast to many of the superheroes displayed in the media, especially on the big screen. Superman, for example, is paired with Batman because of each character’s ability to offer contrasting points of view.  Batman often criticizes his counter part for his ivory towered view of the world as result of his many extraordinary abilities such as flight, super strength and speed.  On the other hand Superman often criticizes Batman for his inability to let others into his well guarded psyche and inability to trust even his fellow heroes in the Justice League[1] The purpose of this comparison is to illustrate that Batman’s human traits although flawed represent the best that a human being can offer in the face of immortality.  They are what make him such a formidable opponent against injustice because he must always be aware that not only will he will never be as strong or swift as his counterparts, he will also age and eventually die.  In essence, his greatest strength and motivating force is that he is flawed. Although he is often described as a dark character he possesses qualities that in my opinion keep him honest about his limitations.  Because his abilities are not godlike, he is not expected to be a god. He has been given the advantaged and disadvantaged position of perpetually residing in the shades of gray that his character traits dictate, eluding black and white classifications much like he avoids danger time and time again in his stories. His angst from losing his parents, resourcefulness in the face of danger fueled by his will and his inherited wealth, which funds all of the devices used in his war on crime are all bolstered by monolithic self-righteousness also inherited from that fateful moment in a dark alley in Gotham.  All of these traits have proven to be both allies and enemies of the caped crusader.  For example, his angst creates an air of mystery, an attribute he has used to his advantage in keeping secrets like his identity safe.  Many writers of the comic depict him as a man who is guarded and unable to maintain relationships.  Letting his guard down always presents the greatest danger.[2] The genesis of these characteristics leads back to Batman’s creator, Bob Kane.  Although Kane did not suffer the same tragedies as his creation there are traces of all of Batman’s major characteristics that stem from Kane’s humble beginnings in the Bronx NY.  Bruce Wayne’s lamentable past is one that does not come without a sense of irony.  On the surface, his wealth creates a gulf of distinction between he and other boys his age until his parents’ death.  Although this event does not change his economic status, it is an equalizing force that changes the course of his life.  Wayne’s lens that was once clouded by wealth, privilege and naiveté reveals a darker vision of life that up until that tragic event was only shared by others outside of his field of vision.  He makes it his duty to wipe the muck from this lens not just for his self but also for everyone in Gotham.  In essence, he begins to see that the happiness that he was robbed of is everyone’s right not just his.  His tragedy serves as proof positive that events such as this have a lasting impact.  In this case, Wayne chooses to use his resources to make the impact a positive one. The same could be said about Bob Kane. Like the thief depicted in the first Batman comic, this event also stole happiness from people’s lives. But for some like Kane it also replaced what was taken with ingenuity and creativity. Although the effects of his personal tragedies, which were mostly financial, did not carry the grotesque bite of murder like his creation, they were impactful enough to force into light a creative energy that was part regret and part hope. For example, he explains that his dad had to struggle for most of his relatively short life to earn a living for [his] family.  To supplement his income, he sold insurance on the side. He rarely took a vacation, and his constant chasing of the dollar left [him] with a feeling of insecurity…[Kane] realized that watching [his] dad’s plight was his strongest motivating force, and this compelled [him] to use [his] talent for cartooning to its fullest. [He] wanted the better things in life and poverty did not fit into his plans. He also stresses that had [his] father been wealthy [he] doubts whether he would have had the incentive to work as hard as [he] did to become successful at [his] chosen craft (Kane 6).  Again, irony plays a role here and creates an interesting theme that runs through the lives of both Kane and Wayne.   It is interesting that Kane would create a wealthy character whose fear and insecurity lie in his inability to prevent tragedy.  Yet Kane himself found salvation in his lack of such resources. Although the character and the man come from different walks of life, they both share a common desire to overcome the poverty of the soul that can result from an unfulfilled life. 
Enter Frank Miller:  Batman, Angst and the unfulfilled Soul
Modern Batman stories reveal an individual driven by vengeance. His rage is directed not only at the individual who killed his parents, but ineffective police force that failed to protect his parents as well. The scene is set in a dark alley outside the cinema where Thomas and Martha Wayne are happily preoccupied with their 8 year old son’s reenactment of a scene from his favorite movie “The Mark of Zorro”.  The tender family moment ends abruptly when a robber emerges from the shadows and kills both of his parents while he watches, powerless to save them.  Wayne’s effort to remedy his lack of power becomes a running theme in his adult life.  He seeks to eradicate it along with Gotham’s criminal element as a masked vigilante and along the way meets foes like the Joker and others who share similar pathologies but have chosen to wreak havoc on society instead saving it[3].  But Batman’s origin as a masked avenger is not uncommon.  Other masked vigilante’s within the comic book universe such as Spiderman and Daredevil are just a few who share origins spawned from the painful loss of loved ones.  Spiderman’s decision to become a hero came from using his powers for self gain.  His first mission after being bitten by a radioactive spider was to enter a wrestling competition and use the money to impress his love interest Mary Jane Watson.  After winning this competition and getting cheated out of his winnings, he witnesses a robbery and decides to let an armed thief escape with the purse. He later discovers that the same thief he let escape killed his beloved uncle Ben Parker in an attempt to steal his car.  Daredevil similarly loses his father a professional boxer, to the criminal known as the Kingpin because he refuses to throw a fight.  One vital element of the Batman story is the recurrent and pivotal moment of his parent’s death.  Many writers both in the comic and on the screen have revisited this moment with Wayne as he takes his yearly excursion to Crime Alley, the place where they were killed and drops to roses on that very spot. This crucial moment remains vital to the setting, which is one of the most important elements of the Batman mythos. Writers who truly understand Batman are aware that in order to truly appreciate and understand him, this moment in his history must remain ever present.   It is here where Bruce Wayne first becomes aware of Gotham the concrete-clad beast that he must conquer. But as Frank Miller reveals in his stories Batman: Year One and The Dark Knight Returns, conquering the beast cannot be accomplished without becoming a part of it. In the former, a 25 year-old Bruce, the prodigal son of Gotham returns home after traveling the world in search of training for his monumental task as the caped crusader.  But Frank Miller’s Bruce Wayne is still a novice to crime fighting.  Although he possesses many fighting skills, he is still naïve to the ways of Gotham.  It is a city where most of the police force and city officials are corrupt and fighting crime is no easy task. He is not yet aware of the symbiotic relationship between he and the city.  He sees only an enemy that he must conquer.  Part of Miller’s narrative skill in this tale is in taking the reader down Wayne’s dark journey to knighthood with his inner monologue[4] as the only lamplight.   It begins on a plane closing in on the city. Bruce Wayne gazes out of his window as the captain announces the final descent.  He ponders that from where he is sitting just above its clean shafts of concrete and snowy rooftops, which are the work of men who died generations ago it looks like an achievement. Here Miller’s allusion to the crime ridden labyrinth that awaits our hero could serves both a wink to those in the know and an invitation to the absurd for those who are new to the Batman myth.   He gives an even better clue about this world that awaits Wayne as he continues to ponder during his descent on to the city and decides that he should have taken the train, [he] should be closer…[he] should see the enemy.  Another example comes a few pages later as he walks through the belly of his adversary on a twenty-block walk to the enemy camp where along the way he is sized up like a piece of meat by the leather boys in Robinson Park, waded through pleas and half-hearted threats from junkies at the Finger Memorial and stepped across a field of human rubble that lay sleeping in front of the overcrowded Sprang Mission.  Although Miller’s opinions of city dwellers is of course screaming from these pages,[5] they do represent a fair view of a character who has experienced trauma at the hands of one of its inhabitants. In this scene Wayne is portrayed as an embittered spirit who has declared war on the city and vengeance for the injustice it has dealt him.   
Batman: Year One is a coming of age story for the dark knight.   It comes just before he actually realizes that the film of corruption that consumes Gotham is a vital part of his identity, an identity that feeds on the night.  So he decides to embrace this part of Gotham that awakens at dusk and form a relationship with it.  His heroic deeds however are not without their share of breaking and entries, assaults, and obstructions of justice.  In essence, all of the things that people, especially criminals fear about the night must include Batman or he will be obsolete. In the 1980’s Tim Burton was the first to take the torch lit by Miller and attempt to take Batman’s noir setting to the big screen.[6]  Although Burton’s attempt was a failure by many fan’s standards, it did enable Warner Brothers who was soon to follow and reaffirm the hero’s relationship between Gotham and the night. In an episode entitled ‘Nothing to Fear” from the Emmy Award winning “Batman: The Animated Series”, it becomes evident when he shouts the words, ‘I am vengeance, I am the night, I am Batman’ as the villain Scarecrow attempts to drive him insane with a fear toxin which reveals Bruce Wayne’s greatest fear; disappointing his father.  Batman shouts this declaration to anchor his self, face this fear and reaffirm why he dons the cape and cowl. In essence, Batman needs Gotham as much as it needs him. Without it he is merely Bruce Wayne Billionaire playboy who lives off of his father’s money.  Gotham is a living-breathing reminder of his parent’s death and his purpose, especially when the sun goes down.  When reading the Batman comic, the reader is always conscious of that alley where Bruce Wayne’s parents were killed.  He [Wayne] keeps the reader hyper-aware of this small stretch of darkness and tar through his many excursions through the dark streets of Gotham, while behind the wheel of the Bat mobile, and as he stands on rooftops gazing down at the city.  The reader can get the sense that somewhere below there is an injustice waiting to happen just like the one that happened to his parents. A large part of Batman’s appeal in this regard is that he is self-aware of his many assets as well as his human limitations.  As he gazes down at the city where he lost the two people most dear to him, he is ever conscious that although he can save many like them, he cannot save them all.  In spite of this he possesses an impenetrable single-mindedness that often borders on insanity and he has maintained it at the risk of failed relationships, perpetual loneliness, and the inevitable disappointment of a mission that is doomed to fail (at least in his lifetime)[7] eventually because of old age and death.
In the book Batman and Philosophy: The Dark Knight of the Soul, David M. Hart attributes the dark knight’s ill-fated choice to a Heideggerian[8] definition of angst.  In these terms angst is defined as an individual’s uncomfortable feeling of authentically confronting the certain possibility of [their] own death. In other words, when a person confronts their own death, they see that it is something that no one else can do for them, something they will have to face alone. This in turn casts their whole life in a new light…[As a result], the completed story of their life will be the result of the possibilities chosen for their self from out of the situation which they were thrown into birth. (Hart 220)
Heidegger’s definition adds yet a clearer focus to the recurrent rooftop scene described earlier.  As Batman gazes upon the streets of Gotham and ponders all of the crimes that he will both succeed and fail at preventing, he can at least find comfort in the fact that he has chosen to do something about it.  The fact that this is a choice that creates adversaries even in his personal life (ie; his alienation of Robin and a host of love interests) is of little concern. Because he is mindful of his own mortality, Batman is able to maintain a single-minded determination about his mission, seeing his life and his world exclusively in terms of the singular project he’s chosen for himself. Instead of being driven by guilt over his parents’ death (an event he really had no control over) or from the criminals who had nothing to do with it, perhaps the real impact of that fateful night was instilling in young Bruce Wayne an authentic understanding of his own life as finite and limited. If Heidegger’s claims about our relation to death were right then the consideration of his own death in angst would have allowed Bruce to decide on a life for himself without any regard for the exceptions of so-called normal society free to organize his entire existence around a mission of his own choosing, and limited only by the possibilities into which he finds himself thrown (which aren’t very limiting when you’re an heir to billions), an authentic recognition of his own inevitable death could have allowed Bruce Wayne to become Batman purely out of a sense of responsibility for his own existence. (222)
When David Meets Goliath:  Resourcefulness in the pursuit of Gotham
Batman’s resourcefulness in the face of danger could be perceived as a modern day re-telling of the David and Goliath story.  Many of the villains he faces are mere mortals like him.  But they all share the common goal of conquering the giant that is Gotham City.  Each of the villains he faces in some way wish to make the city their own, from villains like The Penguin, who seek to reap its financial benefits to the Joker who want to watch it burn their goal is always to conquer Gotham.  Batman stands at the center of the battle taking all comers.  He too wants to conquer the giant but if asked he would say that it’s simply so that order may prevail. But the close observer would discover that in a city like Gotham, this is an impossible goal and he knows it. But if nothing else it offers good story telling. And as long as there is a beast called Gotham to fuel Batman’s angst the stories will continue. Tony Spanakos in the book Batman and Philosophy:  The Dark Knight of the Soul offers the view that:

Gotham [City], particularly its government, is the source of Batman’s angst. Thomas and Martha Wayne [his parents] were murdered because the state was incapable of maintaining law and order, and Bruce Wayne’s response was to become the crime-fighting Batman, trying to correct the lack of order in his city.  Though extreme, this reaction is not unique.  Nearly all of the major characters in the Batman pantheon are reacting against a state that is perceived as either too weak or too restrictive.  Batman…has a more nuanced vision of public safety in that he supports the state but rejects its exclusive authority in the area of security.  This highlights the precarious nature of political rule, and it also explains why the Batman has such a problematic relationship with the state. (Spanakos 2008)

Spanakos’s point sheds light on a vital element in Batman’s motivation to become a hero.  His distrust of the criminal justice system forces him to react with vigor to the injustices in Gotham City.  Because he is the hero in this tale, his stake in the pursuit of Gotham is established forthright.  But as mentioned earlier, his task is not a simple one because Gotham is a beast that feeds on fear and corruption.  In BM Year One, Bruce Wayne realizes this but like David he meets the challenge unabashedly.  He is David with a slight advantage however. He has the financial resources to take on the mob bosses and corrupt police force that run the city. In this context, Goliath meets Goliath.  However, Wayne must become David whenever he dons the cape and cowl. This makes him unique among the giants he often calls his allies in the Justice League.  He realizes that the police force would immediately throw him in jail if he were caught because in a city as corrupt as Gotham, a vigilante is the last thing they need.


[1] The Justice League is a team of Superheroes consisting of the Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, The Flash and a host of others from the DC Comics Universe.  Batman joined this team later in his career as he grew mature enough to realize that he could not save the world on his own.
[2] In a two part graphic novel series entitled The Widening Gyre and Cacophony written by famed filmmaker Kevin Smith, Batman actually does this.  He finally reaches the happiness and catharsis of finding a woman that he both loves and trusts.  The added bonus is that he does not have to hide who he is to her.  Further icing on the cake is that he discovers a new hero in Gotham who is just as talented as he is.  In this story Batman does the unthinkable. He reveals his identity and the location of the bat cave to his new fiancé and this new hero. The results are catastrophic thus confirming the point that a Batman without angst would not only mean the undoing of him, but the entire Batman mythos as well. 
[3] There are various origins of the Joker and they all have a unique perspective on the character’s motives.  For the sake of continuity I will refer to Alan Moore’s version taken from the story “The Killing Joke”.  In this story he is depicted as a former engineer who quits his job to become a comedian.  After he fails at this endeavor he becomes desperate to feed his pregnant wife and decides to help a group of gangsters rob a business next door to his former job at a chemical plant. During the planning of this robbery he finds out that his wife and child to be are killed, but he is forced by the gangsters to continue with the job. Batman foils their plan and in an attempt to escape he falls in to vat, which bleaches his skin, turns his hair green and his lips ruby red. After this the man known as the Joker emerges.
[4] The character’s inner thoughts are usually indicated by a yellow square with text, not to be confused by the dialogue bubbles, which indicate that characters are talking to each other.
[5] Later in his career Miller was berated by many of his fans for his extreme and allegedly racist views especially about the Middle East.  He has also made many inflammatory statements about the OWS protestors.  Many of these statements can be found on Miller’s blog.
[6] More on this later.
[7] In the animated series Batman Beyond, the older curmudgeonly Bruce Wayne is not far from this description. However, he does find an heir to his mantle.  The story is set in a dystopian future where flying cars and other types of high technology are the norm, but the criminal element is just as bad if not worse than in Wayne’s hay day as the bat.  The new Batman Terry McGinnis loses his father to a corrupt businessman who happens to be Bruce’s business partner.  Bruce recognizes that his partner is corrupt but finds it hard to expose him.  He decides to use Terry to help him do this and continue to fight crime in the new Gotham. He furnishes him with a new and improved bat suit that gives him heightened strength, flight, and an arsenal of weapons.  The suit also comes equipped with video and audio communication devices so that Bruce Wayne can have birds eye view of all McGinnis’s crime fighting excursions and advise him along the way.
[8] Although my knowledge of Heidegger and hardly a platform I would use to analyze Batman, I thought that this argument was consistent enough with my own.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Dark Knight Thesis Chunk #3

Hello Folks,

So I decided to lay off all of the philosophical mumbo jumbo about Batman and just write about Batman. Here is just a few pages of what I came up with so far. Not sure where in the paper it will go, but it is making me feel a bit more grounded in what I am actually trying to say.  Hope you agree.



Craig Knight
April 1, 2012



Batman Begins…Again
            Modern Batman stories reveal an individual driven by vengeance. His rage is directed not only at the individual who killed his parents, but ineffective police force that failed to protect his parents as well. The scene is set in a dark alley outside the cinema where Thomas and Martha Wayne are happily preoccupied with their 8 year old son’s reenactment of a scene from his favorite movie “The Mark of Zorro”.  The tender family moment ends abruptly when a robber emerges from the shadows and kills both of his parents while he watches, powerless to save them.  Wayne’s effort to remedy his lack of power becomes a running theme in his adult life.  He seeks to eradicate it along with Gotham’s criminal element as a masked vigilante and along the way meets foes like the Joker and others who share similar pathologies but have chosen to wreak havoc on society instead saving it[1].  But Batman’s origin as a masked avenger is not uncommon.  Other masked vigilante’s within the comic book universe such as Spiderman and Daredevil are just a few who share origins spawned from the painful loss of loved ones.  Spiderman’s decision to become a hero came from using his powers for self gain.  His first mission after being bitten by a radioactive spider was to enter a wrestling competition and use the money to impress his love interest Mary Jane Watson.  After winning this competition and getting cheated out of his winnings, he witnesses a robbery and decides to let an armed thief escape with the purse. He later discovers that the same thief he let escape killed his beloved uncle Ben Parker in an attempt to steal his car.  Daredevil similarly loses his father a professional boxer, to the criminal known as the Kingpin because he refuses to throw a fight.  One vital element of the Batman story is the recurrent pivotal moment of his parent’s death. This crucial moment remains vital to the setting, which is one of the most important elements of the Batman mythos.  It is here where Bruce Wayne first becomes aware of Gotham as a concrete-clad beast that he must conquer. But as Frank Miller reveals in his stories Batman: Year One and The Dark Knight Returns, conquering the beast cannot be accomplished without becoming a part of it. In the former, a 25 year-old Bruce, the prodigal son of Gotham returns home after traveling the world in search of training for his monumental task as the caped crusader.  But Frank Miller’s Bruce Wayne is still a novice to crime fighting.  Although he possesses many fighting skills, he is still naïve to the ways of Gotham.  It is a city where most of the police force and city officials are corrupt and fighting crime is no easy task. He is not yet aware of the symbiotic relationship between he and the city.  He sees only an enemy that he must conquer.  Part of Miller’s narrative skill in this tale is in taking the reader down Wayne’s dark journey to knighthood with his inner monologue as the only lamplight.  It begins on a plane closing in on the city. Bruce Wayne gazes out of his window as the captain announces the final descent.  He ponders that from where he is sitting just above its clean shafts of concrete and snowy rooftops, which are the work of men who died generations ago it looks like an achievement.  He continues to ponder and then decides that he should have taken the train, [he] should be closer…[he] should see the enemy.  Another example comes a few pages later as he walks through the belly of the beast on a twenty-block walk to the enemy camp where along the way he is sized up like a piece of meat by the leather boys in Robinson Park, waded through pleas and half-hearted threats from junkies at the Finger Memorial and stepped across a field of human rubble that lay sleeping in front of the overcrowded Sprang Mission.  Although Miller’s opinions of city dwellers is of course screaming from these pages,[2] they do represent a fair view of a character who has experience trauma at the hands of one of its inhabitants. In this scene Wayne is portrayed as an embittered spirit who has declared war on the city the injustice it has dealt him.   
Batman: Year One is a coming of age story for the dark knight.   It comes just before he actually realizes that the film of corruption that consumes Gotham is a vital part of his identity, an identity that feeds on the night.  So he decides to embrace this part of Gotham that awakens at dusk and form a symbiotic relationship with it.  His heroic deeds however are not without their share of breaking and entries, assaults, and obstructions of justice.  In essence, all of the things that people, especially criminals fear about the night must include Batman or he will be obsolete.  Time Warner a company that has in the past decade been instrumental in reinforcing the noir image of Batman makes this evident. In an episode entitled ‘Nothing to Fear” from the Emmy Award winning “Batman: The Animated Series”, he shouts the words, ‘I am vengeance, I am the night, I am Batman’ as the villain Scarecrow attempts to drive him insane with a fear toxin which reveals Bruce Wayne’s greatest fear of disappointing his father.  Batman shouts this declaration to anchor his self and face this fear to reaffirm why he dons the cape and cowl. In essence, Batman needs Gotham as much as it needs him. Without it he is merely Bruce Wayne Billionaire playboy who lives off of his father’s money.  Gotham is a living-breathing reminder of his parent’s death and his purpose, especially when the sun goes down.  When reading the Batman comic, the reader is always conscious of that alley where Bruce Wayne’s parents were killed.  He [Wayne] keeps the reader hyper-aware of this small stretch of darkness and tar through his many excursions through the dark streets of Gotham while behind the wheel of the Bat mobile or as he stands on rooftops gazing down at the city.  The reader can get the sense that somewhere below there is an injustice waiting to happen just like the one that happened to his parents. His power is in his ability to prevent such crimes but his powerlessness is in knowing that there will always be another.


[1] There are various origins of the Joker and they all have a unique perspective on the character’s motives.  For the sake of continuity I will refer to Alan Moore’s version taken from the story “The Killing Joke”.  In this story he is depicted as a former engineer who quits his job to become a comedian.  After he fails at this endeavor he becomes desperate to feed his pregnant wife and decides to help a group of gangsters rob a business next door to his former job at a chemical plant. During the planning of this robbery he finds out that his wife and child to be are killed, but he is forced by the gangsters to continue with the job. Batman foils their plan and in an attempt to escape he falls in to vat, which bleaches his skin, turns his hair green and his lips ruby red. After this the man known as the Joker emerges.
[2] Later in his career Miller was berated by many of his fans for his extreme and allegedly racist views especially about the Middle East.  He has also made many inflammatory statements about the OWS protestors.  Many of these statements can be found on Miller’s blog.

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Revision

Hello Again,

So as Promised here is another revision of my work.  Feel free to view at your leisure. 

-cheers



Craig Knight
Submission 1
March 10, 2012



Over the past 70 years, comic books and superheroes have been an enduring tribute to the ever-changing heroic ideal. These characters that boldly defended truth, justice and the equally evolving American way, have attempted to follow the same script handed down since the their inception. This ideal that was spawned in the early days of good vs. evil has grown more and more nebulous with each coming age.  In the early days of the medium known as the Golden Age[1], the superhero’s goal was strait forward because it was aligned with the nation’s aim of defeating fascism.  Hero’s like Captain America, Superman and Wonder Woman donned the colors of the flag as they pummeled German soldiers and other villains who threatened the security of American citizens.  During this stage in the development of comics, evil was simple, neatly packaged and ideal propaganda against real life enemies abroad.  In the 1950’s however, the end of World War II and the allies’ victory left a void where the need for such heroes once thrived.  Few titles survived this dilemma except Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman.  Ironically, their most epic battles have been with aging fans that push them to continually prove their relevance[2]. Current writers in this genre such as Frank Miller, Brian Azzarello and Ed Brubaker are attempting to yet again redefine the superhero in response to this aging group of comic book readers [quant data will verify this] that have over the years become more mature and more skeptical. In the Golden Age, comic book writers strived to pinpoint the vivid contrast between the hero and his nemesis.  For example, heroes like Superman were always given socially redeeming characteristics such as unblemished integrity and a pleasant disposition separating him from his counterpart Lex Luthor who often showed disdain for the weak and less fortunate. But recent trends in the genre have highlighted super heroes’ personality flaws. Today’s artists and writers have risen to the challenge of capturing these nuances making them more appealing mature fans who are now between 30 to 50 and aware of their own mortality.  Historically, Homer’s depiction of Odysseus as an adulterer and Jesus’s temptations have revealed that fallibility has always been a vital part of the male hero archetype. And virtue and evil have always been choices.  But do these choices always serve the greatest good?  In the modern age of comics attempts at answering this question abound. In recent years, Batman comics, films and video games have been among them.

My interest and the topic of this thesis are in Batman’s current relevance as an American icon. I believe that much of his significance is in his imperfections and contradictions as a character. I will admit that much of the appeal for me is that he is a hero without superpowers.  This flaw is in many ways his greatest advantage.  In many of the Batman stories both old and new, his lack of special abilities has caused many to underestimate him.  His ability to both accept and transcend this flaw unleashes a larger theme of human potential and its enduring appeal.  His lack of superhuman strength, speed or flight is merely a vehicle for him to explore the greatest superpower of all, human achievement, but not just on a physical level.  The intrigue of Batman as a hero lies in the part of him that may be over looked, his alter ego Bruce Wayne.  Wayne’s life is often shown as a mere distraction to the real story that is Batman.  But the most fascinating thing about him is that the things that make him a hero are steeped in his own humanity. There are four major components that are in my opinion vital to the Batman mythos.  His heroic status is contingent upon wealth, regret, intelligence and will.   Although these qualities leave much to be desired when considering the merits of a hero, they are instrumental in his sustainability as a bona fide crusader for his own dark version of justice, which is separated by a thin line that borders revenge.  Over the years, these qualities have become the Batman character’s own brand of heroic virtues which set him apart from the likes of other heroes such as Superman who has traditionally depicted the consummate boy scout of the comic book world.  Also, these are the key components that contribute his dark appeal, which was later explored by Frank Miller and others. These qualities could be viewed as firebrands or instruments of torture that have seared their mark on his soul driving his motivations nearly into the darker realm of anti-hero.  But with all of the darkness he presents, his own brand of morality has also kept him from going completely to that place. In essence, Batman has all of the qualities of a boogey man for justice who inspires fear in his enemies without inflicting the ultimate sentence of death. This is because Wayne the real hero keeps him grounded as he presumably enjoys all of the frivolities of his wealth by day and fights the forces that resent him by night.  However, he does not fight anyone’s legal pursuit of these very same frivolities, proving the point that his job as a hero is both difficult and complex.
Conflicting Symbols:  Bruce Wayne Vs. The Bat

Many fans would agree that the origin of Batman is one of the most interesting of all superheroes.  Other comics like Marvel Comics’ Daredevil, and Spiderman to name a few have all followed the formula of tragic deaths forging their characters in to avengers for justice.  But none of these heroes wear their angst quite like Batman. The impact on Bruce Wayne’s psyche and its most pronounced symptom, brooding seriousness is vividly contrasted to Spiderman’s wit after the loss of his uncle Ben and Daredevil’s dashing demeanor in spite of the loss of his father.  Even Batman’s sidekick Robin insists on seeing the lighter side of things especially while on the job of crime fighting.  Batman on the other hand takes on a different persona.  Because he blames his self for not being able to save his parents, he is in constant battle with his conscience. In his book Super Heroes: A Modern Mythology, Richard Reynolds illustrates Bruce Wayne’s decision to become a symbol of fear to battle both his demons and the crime element in Gotham City. He decides to don the symbol of a bat, a creature of the night, when a bat flies through his window while he sits brooding in his father’s study.  He views this as a definitive omen and says the famous words from Batman 47[3]; ‘Criminals are a superstitious, cowardly lot, so I must wear a costume that will strike terror into their hearts! I must be creature of the night, like a…a …A Bat! (Reynolds 67) Although this decision by modern standards might seem a bit corny, it is clear that Bruce Wayne’s decision to become a bat was a direct cause of profound angst that could only be alleviated by taking action.  So another major appeal of his character is that although he is just a mortal man, he is more capable than anyone in Gotham City to make such an absurd idea a reality.

Tony Spanakos in the book Batman and Philosophy:  The Dark Knight of the Soul offers the view that:

Gotham [City], particularly its government, is the source of Batman’s angst. Thomas and Martha Wayne [his parents] were murdered because the state was incapable of maintaining law and order, and Bruce Wayne’s response was to become the crime-fighting Batman, trying to correct the lack of order in his city.  Though extreme, this reaction is not unique.  Nearly all of the major characters in the Batman pantheon are reacting against a state that is perceived as either too weak or too restrictive.  Batman…has a more nuanced vision of public safety in that he supports the state but rejects its exclusive authority in the area of security.  This highlights the precarious nature of political rule, and it also explains why the Batman has such a problematic relationship with the state. (Spanakos 2008)

Spanakos’s point sheds light on a vital element in Batman’s motivation to become a hero.  His distrust of the system forces him to react with vigor to the injustices in Gotham City. Again, the major appeal here is that he has both the resources and desire to affect change when most face the common dilemma of having one or the other but never both.  This of course gives the reader the best of both worlds.  He is both rich and righteous in an era where the two clash. The reader shares his distrust of the system and also aspires to his wealthy lifestyle. A major issue is that Batman being a symbol of the elite is a hero of contradictions.   His alter ego Bruce Wayne is depicted as a benevolent billionaire whose moral character would not allow him to the kinds of activities that would be necessary to maintain his fortune in an arena where morals don’t account for much.  In fact writers of the comic have even emphasized his image as a playboy who is to busy having parties and fraternizing with women to involve his self in business matters. There are no hostile take-overs or government bailouts in his stories. One may assume that he dons the cape and cowl at night as a means to repent for the sins he commits by day.
Although Spanakos’s analysis places Batman comfortably in the category of hero, skeptics might still question his conviction to serving the greater good even if he attempts to do it through physical acts of heroism night after night.  In Batman and Philosophy, Mahesh Ananth and Ben Dixon argue that Bruce Wayne’s decision to become Batman was morally questionable.  They argue that Batman on his best night could not do nearly as much good as his alter ego, billionaire Bruce Wayne.  They cite Peter Singer, a utilitarian philosopher to galvanize their claims. Singer’s song is in praise of the utilitarian doctrine that encourages us to perform acts that create the greatest good or the least amount of evil for the greatest number of people. (Ananth & Dixon 103) An interesting caveat to this doctrine hidden in the fine print is that such acts be committed ‘without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance’. (103) Singer also focuses on the minimum amount of ‘moral cost’ an individual would expend if they happened upon a small child drowning in a shallow pond stressing that the greatest cost would be wet or muddy clothes.  According to Singer, saving a child under such circumstances is something everyone ought to do.  In his view, this principle could also be applied to the ‘affluent members of the Western world with all of our frivolities’.  Singer questions our willingness to give up our CD’s DVD’s, name brand clothing if it meant that we might in return save human lives. (104) Singer also makes clear two forms of giving, strong and moderate.
The strong version claims that we’re morally obligated to give until we reach the point where we could cause as much suffering to ourselves as is present in those we are helping, unless in doing so we had to sacrifice something of comparable moral significance.  The moderate version, in contrast, claims that we’re morally obligated to give until we reach the point at which we sacrifice something morally significant as a result of our degree of giving. (105)

According to Mehesh and Ananth, Bruce Wayne’s contribution to the less fortunate in Gotham doesn’t quite fit what I will call the Singarian framework of giving.  He would in fact be more effective if he just became the ultimate humanitarian and give up more than half of his fortune.  Unfortunately, this method does not sell comic books, movie tickets or video games.  Singer’s philosophy would in fact eliminate the need for a Batman and more importantly obliterate the Batman myth.  This would make one wonder if we were a society that is addicted to symbols and how much we prefer symbols to actual solutions to the problems that plague Western society.  For example, when a real life bat signal was projected across the Verizon building back in November donning the   the numbers 99% and other powerful messages it was another alert to the country’s wealthy that change is imminent.  For Batman, his signal was a call for his help. In his stories many criticized his form of help.[4]  What kinds “help” will result from these real life bat signals? Opinions are of course varied.





















Works Cited

Baron-Carvais, Isabelle. “Superheroes to Americas Rescue”. Raison Presente 64 (1982): 49-59. Sociological Abstracts. 30 Jan. 2012.

Creekmur, Corey K. "Superheroes And Science Fiction: Who Watches Comic Books?" Science Fiction Studies 31.2 (2004): 283-290. Humanities International Complete. Web. 31 Jan. 2012.

Fouillet, Aurelien. "From Daedalus to Batman: Study on a Contemporary Imaginary: Superheroes." Societes.4 (2009): 25-32. Sociological Abstracts. 30 Jan. 2012 .


Knilli, Friedrich, et al. "Aspects of the Development of a Visual Culture as Exemplified by the Comics: The State of Comics Research in the Federal Republic of Germany." Communications 9.- (1983): 149-89. Sociological Abstracts. 30 Jan. 2012 .

Larson, Mark. "Lawsuit Seeks Back Rent from Moribund e-Retailer." Sacramento Business Journal 17.44 (2001): 11-. ABI/INFORM Complete; ProQuest Central; ProQuest Education Journals; ProQuest Newsstand; ProQuest Psychology Journals; ProQuest Research Library; ProQuest Social Science Journals. 30 Jan. 2012.

Partible, Leo. "Superheroes in Film and Pop Culture: Silhouettes of Redemption on the Screen."
             Ed. B. J. Oropeza and Stan Lee.Peter Lang, 2005. 229-254. MLA International Bibliography.
             31 Jan. 2012 .


White, Mark D, and Robert Arp. Batman and Philosophy: The Dark Knight of the Soul. Hoboken, N.J:
             John Wiley & Sons, 2008. Print.








[1] The Golden Age of comics was from 1938 to 1949.
[2] This information comes mostly from personal observations and discussions with comic book owners and employees in Brooklyn and Manhattan.  Being a comic nerd myself I rarely see people under the age of 20 shopping for traditional super hero comic books. Classic heroes like Batman and Superman have been left to the older generation. And that generation expects these heroes to grow and evolve.
[3] This issue first appeared in June 1948. Bill Finger and Bob Kane wrote it.
[4] Some good examples of public criticism of Batman are in Frank Miller’s classic, The Dark Knight Returns.

Monday, March 5, 2012

My Journey to Gotham (Thesis Chunk #1)

Hello all,

To those of you who have followed this blog I would like to apologize for staying away so long.  All I have been writing for the past several months are papers in an effort to finally graduate from graduate school.  Well I'm almost at the finished line and I am humbly requesting your help to help me finish my thesis.  I will be periodically posting chunks of this project in hopes that you (all 3 of you) will offer honest critiques of it in all of its incarnations.  I am mostly interested in what you think about the content over anything else.  I can always go back and edit grammar.  So, that being said here is chunk #1.





Thesis Proposal, Craig Knight
Advisor:  Melissa Monroe
Second Reader: Charlene Bryant
MLA Format


Over the past century, comic books and superheroes have been an enduring tribute to the evolving heroic ideal.  These characters that boldly defended truth, justice and the equally evolving American way continue to pursue these same goals today.  Current writers in this genre such as Frank Miller, Brian Azzarello and Ed Brubaker are attempting to yet again redefine the superhero in response to its aging fans that have over the years become more mature and more skeptical. One might even discover that there is a fine line between superheroes and the villains who have sworn to destroy them. Traditionally, comics have always strived to pinpoint the vivid contrast between the hero and his nemesis.  However, recent trends in the genre have highlighted super heroes’ imperfections. Some would even argue that this makes them more appealing to the everyman.  Homer’s depiction of Odysseus as an adulterer and Jesus’s temptations reveal that fallibility has always been a vital part of the male hero archetype. And virtue and evil have always been choices.  But do these choices always serve the greatest good?  In the modern age of comics attempts at answering this question abound.  But there aren’t many that have addressed it more than the Batman comic. 

My interest and the topic of this thesis are in Batman’s current relevance as an American icon. I believe that much of his significance is in his imperfections and contradictions as a character. I will admit that much of the appeal for me is that he is a hero without superpowers.  This flaw is in many ways his greatest advantage.  In many of the Batman stories both old and new, his lack of special abilities has caused many to underestimate him.  His ability to both accept and transcend this flaw unleashes a larger theme of human potential and its enduring appeal.  His lack of superhuman strength, speed or flight is merely a vehicle for him to explore the greatest superpower of all, human achievement, but not just on a physical level.  The intrigue of Batman as a hero lies in the part of him that may be over looked, his alter ego Bruce Wayne.  Wayne’s life is often shown as a mere distraction to the real story that is Batman.  But the most fascinating thing about him is that the things that make him a hero are steeped in his own humanity. There are four major components that are in my opinion vital to the Batman mythos.  His heroic status is contingent upon wealth, regret, intelligence and will.   Although these qualities leave much to be desired when considering the merits of a hero, they are instrumental in his sustainability as a bona fide crusader for justice.  Over the years, these qualities have become the Batman character’s own brand of heroic virtues which set him apart from the likes of other heroes such as Superman who according to many readers of comics is the consummate boy scout of the comic book world.  Also, these are the key components that contribute his dark appeal, which was later explored by Frank Miller and others. These qualities could be viewed as firebrands or instruments of torture that have seared their mark on his soul driving his motivations nearly into the darker realm of anti-hero.  But with all of the darkness he presents, his own brand of morality has also kept him from going completely to that place. In essence, Batman has all of the qualities of a boogey man for justice who inspires fear in his enemies without inflicting the ultimate sentence of death. This is because Wayne the real hero keeps him grounded as he presumably enjoys all of the frivolities of his wealth by day and fights the forces that resent him by night.  However, he does not fight anyone’s legal pursuit of these very same frivolities, proving the point that his job as a hero is both difficult and complex.
Virtue #1 Wealth and the Ability to Manipulate Symbols

Tony Spanakos in the book Batman and Philosophy:  The Dark Knight of the Soul offers the view that:

Gotham [City], particularly its government, is the source of Batman’s angst. Thomas and Martha Wayne [his parents] were murdered because the state was incapable of maintaining law and order, and Bruce Wayne’s response was to become the crime-fighting Batman, trying to correct the lack of order in his city.  Though extreme, this reaction is not unique.  Nearly all of the major characters in the Batman pantheon are reacting against a state that is perceived as either too weak or too restrictive.  Batman…has a more nuanced vision of public safety in that he supports the state but rejects its exclusive authority in the area of security.  This highlights the precarious nature of political rule, and it also explains why the Batman has such a problematic relationship with the state. (Spanakos 2008)

Spanakos’s point sheds light on a vital element in Batman’s motivation to become a hero.  His distrust of the system forces him to react with vigor to the injustices in Gotham City. A major part of the appeal here is that he has both the resources and desire to affect change when most face the common dilemma of having one or the other but never both.  This of course gives the reader the best of both worlds.  He is both rich and righteous in an era where the two clash. The reader shares his distrust of the system and also aspires to his wealthy lifestyle. A major issue is that Batman being a symbol of the elite is a hero of contradictions.   His alter ego Bruce Wayne is depicted as a benevolent billionaire who is morally incapable of resorting to the kinds of activities that would be necessary to maintain his fortune.  There are no hostile take-overs or government bailouts in his stories. One may assume that he dons the cape and cowl at night as a means to repent for the sins he commits by day.
Although Spanakos’s analysis places Batman comfortably in the category of hero, skeptics might still question his conviction to serving the greater good even if he attempts to do it through physical acts of heroism night after night.  In Batman and Philosophy, Mahesh Ananth and Ben Dixon argue that Bruce Wayne’s decision to become Batman was morally questionable.  They argue that Batman on his best night could not do nearly as much good as his alter ego, billionaire Bruce Wayne.  They cite Peter Singer, a utilitarian philosopher to galvanize their claims. Singer’s song is in praise of the utilitarian doctrine that encourages us to perform acts that create the greatest good or the least amount of evil for the greatest number of people. (Ananth & Dixon 103) An interesting caveat to this doctrine hidden in the fine print is that such acts be committed ‘without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance’. (103) Singer also focuses on the minimum amount of ‘moral cost’ an individual would expend if they happened upon a small child drowning in a shallow pond stressing that the greatest cost would be wet or muddy clothes.  According to Singer, saving a child under such circumstances is something everyone ought to do.  In his view, this principle could also be applied to the ‘affluent members of the Western world with all of our frivolities’.  Singer questions our willingness to give up our CD’s DVD’s, name brand clothing if it meant that we might in return save human lives. (104) Singer also makes clear two forms of giving, strong and moderate.
The strong version claims that we’re morally obligated to give until we reach the point where we could cause as much suffering to ourselves as is present in those we are helping, unless in doing so we had to sacrifice something of comparable moral significance.  The moderate version, in contrast, claims that we’re morally obligated to give until we reach the point at which we sacrifice something morally significant as a result of our degree of giving. (105)

According to Mehesh and Ananth, Bruce Wayne’s contribution to the less fortunate in Gotham doesn’t quite fit what I will call the Singarian framework of giving.  He would in fact be more effective if he just became the ultimate humanitarian and give up more than half of his fortune.  Unfortunately, this method does not sell comic books, movie tickets or video games.  Singer’s philosophy would in fact eliminate the need for a Batman and more importantly obliterate the Batman myth.  This would make one wonder if we were a society that is addicted to symbols and how much we prefer symbols to actual solutions to the problems that plague Western society. It would seem that in an election year for example, that whoever holds the most power over symbols wins.  [I will of course explore this further].





















Works Cited

Baron-Carvais, Isabelle. “Superheroes to Americas Rescue”. Raison Presente 64 (1982): 49-59. Sociological Abstracts. 30 Jan. 2012.

Creekmur, Corey K. "Superheroes And Science Fiction: Who Watches Comic Books?" Science Fiction Studies 31.2 (2004): 283-290. Humanities International Complete. Web. 31 Jan. 2012.

Fouillet, Aurelien. "From Daedalus to Batman: Study on a Contemporary Imaginary: Superheroes." Societes.4 (2009): 25-32. Sociological Abstracts. 30 Jan. 2012 .


Knilli, Friedrich, et al. "Aspects of the Development of a Visual Culture as Exemplified by the Comics: The State of Comics Research in the Federal Republic of Germany." Communications 9.- (1983): 149-89. Sociological Abstracts. 30 Jan. 2012 .

Larson, Mark. "Lawsuit Seeks Back Rent from Moribund e-Retailer." Sacramento Business Journal 17.44 (2001): 11-. ABI/INFORM Complete; ProQuest Central; ProQuest Education Journals; ProQuest Newsstand; ProQuest Psychology Journals; ProQuest Research Library; ProQuest Social Science Journals. 30 Jan. 2012.

Partible, Leo. "Superheroes in Film and Pop Culture: Silhouettes of Redemption on the Screen."
             Ed. B. J. Oropeza and Stan Lee.Peter Lang, 2005. 229-254. MLA International Bibliography.
             31 Jan. 2012 .


White, Mark D, and Robert Arp. Batman and Philosophy: The Dark Knight of the Soul. Hoboken, N.J:
             John Wiley & Sons, 2008. Print.








Saturday, September 3, 2011

Marvels of the Midlife Universe

Men want to be superheroes. The lucky among us who shoot baskets, perform to capacity crowds or manage hedge funds are of course among the minority. The rest of us perpetually wait for the grand moment when our super powers will be dramatically revealed. We usually expect or hope that they kick in around the magical age of 40 after the vigorous training of years 1 through 39 have passed. The unfathomable wisdom of this fourth decade of our lives however, is not without a sense of irony. Without a doubt, we do transform. But, like Bruce Banner (aka The Hulk) could attest, it is never in the way we expect. Like Banner, many of us spend at least the first 20 years of our adult lives trying to tame our beastly impulses knowing fully well that after that time passes, the monster has still not left the room but at least he's wearing a tie. For example, if someone told me 20 years ago that I would be a teacher etcetera, etcetera.
Women on the other hand, are born with instant consciousness of their super abilities. It begins the moment they learn to say "dada" which works on fathers in the same way the word Shazzam! affects young Billy Batson. It is the serum that transforms ordinary men into super soldiers assigned to protect their little girls to the death and beyond. But if the soldier has super hearing during this critical period, he can actually pick up his beloved princess telling him that although she appreciates his protection, she would really like him to teach her to take care of herself so she can someday conquer half the world and get her man to conquer the other half whenever she gets tired or bored. I realize that this makes her sound more like a super villain, but I guess it just depends on your view of Beyonce'.
If I could give my fiance' a superhero name it would be "The Womb"; ABLE TO GIVE BIRTH TO TWO AMAZING CHILDREN!" And while the world stands stupefied waiting to hear the remaining list of her abilities she would roll her eyes and place her arms gently akimbo and with subtle sarcasm say "Did, you really think I needed to say more?” And after the 23 seconds it takes for the moment to wear off, a reporter would ask: "well is there any thing special you can do with your womb besides the obvious?" And in the 23 seconds it takes to deliver her already calculated response her brilliant smile would remain impenetrable, her eyes a shade browner, a shade more serious and her tone as pleasant as a summer breeze and almost sing the words "honey even superman had a mama". Her other most vital super power would be boldly present, yet, undetected as she uses it to melt every heart in her path.

I have recently become inspired to explore my own super powers and attempt to find a name that suits them. So far I came up with Stress Man, The Worrier and The Mortgage Man which only sounds appropriate when preceded by the question: why are we always so damn broke”?, which would be immediately followed by “why the hell do you think?” which could only be uttered by my fiance' and would perform the double duty of answering my stupid ass question and calling out my full superhero title for theatrical effect. Needless to say, I didn’t choose that one.
Then, I decided to be The Watcher. My powers would be to watch things, let them unfold, and most importantly just shut the f*** up and listen because I might actually learn some shit. But then I realized that "The Watcher” was already taken. So I decided to go with: Justshutthef***upandlistenbecauseyoumightactuallylearnsomeshit Man. Both my name and my super power were revealed to me the day I miraculously stopped repeatedly asking my self the question: How did I get here? The only things in the known universe that would be able to limit my “just” powers are birthdays, Christmases, Valentine's Days and 362 other days whose names escape me. During these days, all of the watching must be replaced with actions. These actions of course would be worthy of the super hero title. But as I mentioned before, this transformation takes time. In fact, I’m not sure if my transformation is quite done. In the mean time stay tuned for the next episode as well as my new Justshutthef***upandlistenbecauseyoumightactuallylearnsomeshit Man t-shirts. They will be ready just as soon as I can find a way to fit all of those words into a cool emblem. Merchandising is everything!

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Worth Explaining

There have been many cases where I have felt like the enemy in my own classroom. The first time I felt it was early in my teaching career at a school in the Bronx. A student was talking loudly during a lesson. All of his classmates were clearly listening to him and not me. When I reminded him that class had started, he replied, “I was explaining something” and all of the students glared at me as if I was the one who was out of line. Who knows? Maybe I was. After all, I was engaging in the same struggle to be an explainer as he. But in that scenario I lost, because he just continued with his explanation, the rest of the class continued listening, and I was confronted with the sobering realization that the lecture is a dying art in New York City public schools.

But there is a part of me that refuses to believe this. It’s the part that was inspired by my 9th grade English teacher Mr. Everett with his cool Clint Eastwood like voice and disposition, which whispered “Make my day” to any freshman that would dare to be a distraction. We couldn’t quite describe what it was that compelled us to respect him. Maybe we were intimidated by the fact that he had so much self control, confidence and above all, patience of which was mostly displayed in the way he carefully chose every word he said with grace and precision. He created a sense of foreboding in his students, leaving us to question what a man with so much patience would do if he was ever pushed to lose it. So we all just gave him the floor whenever his gentle but firm voice suggested it and his strong presence demanded it. I once learned the consequence of violating the unspoken rule against speaking out of turn when I made fun of a student named Jason as he joyfully gave Mr. Everett an account of his dance filled weekend at the local club on the other side of town. I interrupted the conversation with an incredulous question “Jason you can dance”? Instantly, as the words recklessly leapt off my tongue I knew I’d screwed up, because I could hear Mr. Everett taking a breath as he carefully loaded his response to my ill-advised critique from his expansive lexicon and became a verbal Dirty Harry. His icy reply was “Mr. Knight are you implying that this student can’t dance because of his color?”, If so, your classmate and I find that extremely insulting and beneath you”. I was speechless because he was not only right, but his approach was completely unexpected. And, as an added bonus I learned what the word “imply” meant. Although I didn’t change my beliefs about my classmate’s dancing ability, I learned the valuable lesson that there was a time and a place to express my unsolicited opinions. His class was not one of them.
In the current landscape of public education however, Mr. Everett’s approach would seem to be pretty close to impossible.

Mr. Everett had a poetic approach to teaching that the students in my classes fail to appreciate. There are many reasons to consider why students would be non-responsive to his brand of reasoning, like parenting (or the lack of), socio-economics, etc. But the most present factor I encounter daily is a competitive drive to be seen, heard and acknowledged, by any means necessary, no matter how many times they are removed from class, their parents are called, or they are suspended. Most of them are willing to hazard the risk of punishment because the prize they are after is self-esteem. And the only obstacles to this goal are their fellow students and me and my “boring” rants about analyzing elements of plot in short fiction. Even my better students who actually focus on the lessons have a tendency to rudely cut off their peers during class discussions just to be acknowledged for giving the correct answer. I have tried the Everett approach once or twice when this has happened. But the deep sigh, purposed glare, and carefully selected reprimand only resulted in half-hearted apologies followed by repeat offenses 10-20 seconds later (Yes, I have timed them). Other students who find alternate more effective methods of getting attention like farting, belching, or cursing, all of which are done loudly, are too numerous for me to take the calculated approach of my former teacher. In the past I have resorted to yelling, but this is merely a temporary solution. One could argue that my students are enthusiastic and their energies should be redirected and harnessed. This responsibility of course lays with me, the teacher, but the major lesson my students retain daily, is that in the urban class room, only the strongest and the loudest survive. The competitive atmosphere that these factors create is my biggest obstacle to maintaining order in my classes.

Since I have been teaching I have heard many approaches to the growing rambunctiousness in public school class rooms. Many of these models such as backward design, ramp-up and the workshop model all have one major goal in mind which is creating a student centered environment in which the teacher is just a facilitator and the students run the class. Although this is a noble concept, there is also a major flaw. Although students have the ability to take control of any class discussion or activity, they lack the discipline to use this power to a constructive end. In response to this dilemma we teachers set up rules such as “The One Mic” rule which states that only one student should speak at a time. There are also the Socratic seminar and “accountable talk” models which require that students willingly participate in meaningful discussions which address open ended essential questions like “What is a hero?” or “What is self-awareness?”

These approaches create major problems. One is the student who has barely reached the first level of knowledge on Bloom’s Taxonomy. This is a student whose entire academic career before high school was in environments where “right answers” were all that mattered. Often in scenarios like this, the teacher must be diligent in helping students engage in a level of thinking that goes beyond the gold star. So, in high school, students are often introduced abruptly to a form of instruction which asks them to find their own answers to varied levels of teacher questioning. This is one example of differentiated instruction which on paper is supposed to address various learning styles and levels of the student. Students however, become very frustrated because all they want is the answer sans the bells and whistles which educators refer to as the learning process.

Another issue is that in this current environment where older and more experienced teachers are feeling a growing pressure to retire, inexperienced teachers who are new to the daunting task of addressing multiple learning styles, levels, and not to mention egos can easily be bludgeoned into submission with the ever present question “but is this right”? Or “What we gotta’ do”? Incessantly asking a teacher these questions even during tests is customary for this new breed of student. When my students ask those popular questions, I usually ask them what they think. This approach has had some pronounced effects on my class room environment. I have been cursed at, accused of being a bad teacher and even complained against formally. I have become abruptly aware that teachers must perform juggling acts to maintain integrity, please their students and keep administrators happy. On one hand, the teacher who does not address the constant outcry for right answers during his lessons can quickly lose favor with his students which results in disciplinary problems. On other hand, he will also lose equal favor with administrators if he cannot show that he has used every measure possible to address the needs of students and use this data to transform them into critical thinkers.

In one of my classes a student who was unprepared for a test stormed out of class because he didn’t think he should be required to take it. His only reason for his absences was cutting school. I am of course charged with the often tedious task of calling his parents to see why he cut and inform them of all of the work he missed, only to be met with a tone and familiar voice which informs me that the number has been disconnected. Another student who decided to talk and disrupt his peers during an exam was removed from class and sent home. He has since filed a complaint against the school for unfair treatment which is still pending. In reality, students in my classes only want to be “taught” on their terms. The so-called student centered approach is producing a self-centered pupil who is not shy when it comes to accusing his teachers of being inept. And if you don’t believe him, he’s got the poor grades to prove it. The pressure that is imposed on everyone involved in the educational process gives students their pick of scapegoats to justify their own failures. While everyone is fighting for their jobs, they just run amok, fully aware that when they are punished they can blame their behavior on the parent who is too over worked to pay them any attention, the teacher who is stressfully trying to manage 29 other egos, or the dean whom they claim just doesn’t like them. The conflicting interests held by teachers who want autonomy in their classrooms, politicians who want favorable statistics and administrators who want to keep their schools open have made way for a new kind of school environment to emerge.

It would seem that in the midst of all of the problems facing us in education, teachers, administrators, politicians, and of course parents all have some explaining to do. But maybe the time for explaining has come to an end. We are all aware that schools and class rooms are not perfect worlds. But I can recall a time when every effort was made by faculty, students, staff and parents to make them at least seem that way. I can also recall a time when I did not have to be yelled at to strive for perfection, when it didn’t matter whether or not a student liked their seat or whether the teacher “talked too much”. The irony in all of this is that the innovators of this new student centered approach all share these memories. Could it be possible that we are doing more damage than good when we grant autonomy to children who are frighteningly aware that it is an illusion in every other facet of the system that is selling it? Maybe I’m just too old school, but I have decided that teaching is still possible. And maybe the old kind of explaining in the class room is all that I need. There is a little voice in my head that keeps explaining to me, that I should not be afraid to go ahead and make someone’s day, because carefully chosen words can still inspire.